Blog
September 19, 2022
4
min read

Match Pricing: Good for Buyers, Good for Sellers

What do enterprises look for when making a software investment? They seek products that deliver results. The key to turning SaaS pricing strategy into a win-win is to recognize that for buyers, a dollar today doesn’t have the same value as a dollar tomorrow.

Satish Jajodia
Chief Risk Officer
View author profile →

Table of contents

Car buyers get payment options when the sticker price is out of reach; software buyers usually get a discount or a dead deal. This post argues SaaS pricing is not zero-sum, because a dollar spread over time costs a cash-conscious buyer less than a dollar upfront. It follows one deal that held at $4,800 a month instead of collapsing into a $48,000 discount, protecting total contract value.

What do enterprises look for when making a software investment? They seek products that deliver results. But they also seek out solutions that are affordable, and that they can buy without going over budget. In other words, when it comes to buying software, most businesses weigh purchasing decisions in much the same way that consumers do, seeking a good deal at a fair price.

Given that, it's strange that so few SaaS vendors offer consumer-style pricing options for enterprise buyers. If a consumer wants to buy a car but can't afford the full sticker price, they are often given a range of pricing options to meet their needs: a customer might opt for lower payments over a longer period, say, ensuring they still roll away with a shiny new set of wheels.

‍

Turn SaaS pricing into a win-win

When it comes to SaaS procurement, though, the options tend to be less user-friendly. Many subscription offerings require up-front payments, and if budget-conscious buyers balk at those terms, there's no alternative option — they either have to pay up or say goodbye.

Fortunately, there's a better way of doing things. The key is to stop viewing pricing as zero-sum, with sellers seeking the highest price possible and buyers, in turn, seeking the lowest possible total contract value. Instead, software vendors should explore ways to turn pricing into a win-win, delivering more value for customers while maximizing their total revenues over time.

‍

The power of cash flow

The key to turning SaaS pricing strategy into a win-win is to recognize that for buyers, a dollar today doesn't have the same value as a dollar tomorrow. A cash-strapped startup might be far happier paying a slightly larger amount over time, if it means they can keep their capital reserves intact today.

That makes pricing flexibility an important differentiator for SaaS brands in today's competitive software marketplace. By enabling buyers to tweak pricing and payment processes to suit their own needs, it's possible to deliver more value for customers — while netting more total revenues over the lifetime of their contract.

‍

Help customers count their pennies

The current slowdown in VC funding and corresponding reductions in tech budgets make this an especially powerful tool for today's SaaS vendors. Customers are counting their pennies — use this funding comparison calculator to quickly compare the cost of different financing and payment options; and if you can offer them smarter, more flexible ways to spread payments out over time, you'll be seen as a valued partner rather than a drain on their limited resources.

‍

How it works

A thriving frozen-desserts company with almost $350M in annual revenues was shopping for mission-critical SaaS products. Despite its healthy revenue streams, the company was budget-conscious and couldn't afford the $60,000 per year fee initially quoted by their SaaS sales rep.

The sales rep tried following the standard "zero-sum" playbook: if the customer couldn't pay full rate, then the only option was to start offering discounts. The rep offered a discounted quote of just $48,000 per year — but the desserts company still balked at having to pay such a hefty sum up-front.

Fortunately, the sales rep had another trick up her sleeve: she was able to offer a monthly payment plan. Instead of prepaying for a year's service, the desserts company accepted a $4,800 monthly rate over a longer contract period. The result: a win-win deal that made the buyer happier, while also generating more revenues for the SaaS vendor.

‍

Game-changing flexibility

Flexible pricing options are game-changers for both SaaS customers and vendors alike, and tools like Ratio Subscribers make it easy to offer monthly, quarterly, or custom payment plans without sacrificing cash flow. With the new fintech solutions now available; an out of the payment tech stack is needed to give their customers real choice and flexibility.

Advances in AI also allow providers to quickly assess the risk and growth potential of would-be buyers, enabling them to operate with confidence and offer a high degree of customization at checkout.

‍

Aim for win-win deals

By leaning into these innovative new pricing strategies, SaaS businesses can provide the flexibility that their customers crave, create user-friendly sales processes, build stronger relationships, and still maximize their revenues over time — explore how to boost SaaS growth with flexible financing and checkout options.

There's no need for SaaS dealmaking to be fraught — it's time for vendors to change their approach, and turn SaaS pricing into a true win-win scenario. Want to learn more about SaaS pricing for your win-win scenario? Reach out to the Ratio Team today.

↗

The Closing Motion Platform

A dollar today isn't a dollar tomorrow.
Match how buyers pay to how they get value. Ratio pays you the full amount upfront regardless of their schedule.
Or run your numbers first →

Sellers on Ratio see up to 30% higher close rates and 25% higher ACV.

Share the article:
related posts

Insights for Modern Revenue Teams

Explore how B2B technology scale-ups are transforming their closing motion.

The State of the Closing Motion, 2026: What 400 SaaS Leaders Told Us About Getting Paid
Closed-won is a CRM status, not a cash event. We commissioned Censuswide to ask 400 US SaaS CEOs, CROs, CFOs, and revenue leaders how far a signature really sits from money in the bank. The answer is 14.7 days, only 18.8% call a deal closed at signature, and 99% had payment terms change a deal outcome in the last quarter. Here is what the data says, what it costs sales and finance, and what changes when the close stops being four handoffs.
How To Align Subscription Sales And Finance Teams To Close The Cash Flow Gap
Bookings and cash run on different clocks. Sales is measured on what it signs, finance on what it collects, and a quarter can look strong while the bank account does not. This piece takes the four structural causes of that gap: misaligned metrics, uniform payment terms, reflexive discounting, and disconnected quote-to-cash tooling, and walks through the four moves that close it, without asking sales to slow down or finance to carry the wait.
How to Accelerate Sales in B2B SaaS Without Discounting Your Way to the Bottom
Most B2B sales acceleration advice targets rep effort, so it never moves the bottleneck on the buyer's side. The deals that stall are stalling on urgency the buyer never feels, on handoffs that lose cash after the yes, and on losses nobody went back to study. This post covers the three structural levers that remove each one, the three metrics that replace win rate and days to signature, and the audits that tell you which lever to pull first.